Subscribe for updates!

Search this blog..

Top Stories of the week

Risk kids now or later? Ethical dilemma: Should feds test anthrax vaccine on children?

Posted in : Others

(added few months ago!)

Children would be largely unprotected in the event of an anthrax bioterrorism attack because no studies have been done on vaccine risk, benefits and effectiveness in a young population. On the other hand, subjecting children to vaccine injections when there's no imminent or credibly identified risk "just in case" is problematic, especially since no one knows what will happen.

What to do is a question dividing experts across America. And it's about to be decided. Friday, members of the National Biodefense Science Board will decide whether anthrax vaccine testing should take place in children, something that a working group has recommended, after much debate. Experts agree that neither option is great: They can either test now in some healthy children and see if it is safe or wait until there's a real attack and then try to gather the data.

In April, Dr. Nicole Lurie, assistant secretary for preparedness and response in the Department of Health and Human Services, wrote the board asking it to decide. She noted the government has stockpiled a lot of anthrax vaccine to be used post-exposure. Periodically the government runs exercises to practice for a mass vaccination effort, including one recently that highlighted, she said, the policy and response challenges with vaccine use in special populations such as children.

"We have no safety, immunogenicity or efficacy data in pediatric populations that would permit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to evaluate the product for use under an Emergency Use Authorization," she wrote. Gathering that data would appear to be the answer, she said, but "there are legitimate countervailing concerns regarding subjecting children to risk with no clear benefit at the time of the study."

What to do about testing a vaccine against that threat in kids is a question with both practical and ethical implications, experts agree. Children usually are study subjects only when they will reap direct or indirect benefit and there is minimal potential for harm. That's not clear with the anthrax vaccine.

The Centers for Disease Control and Preparedness has categorized anthrax as having "category A" or most dangerous bioterrorism potential, because it can be deadly, may spread across a large area and requires a lot of planning to protect public health. The anthrax spores are formed by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis and take three forms. They can infect through the skin, lungs or the digestive tract.

CDC notes that 80 percent of people infected through skin don't die, even without treatment. In the gastro-intestinal form, between one quarter and one half of cases result in death. And inhalation anthrax is very severe. In 2001, when anthrax was sent through the U.S. mail system, about half of those who inhaled it died.

Tags : Risk, Kids, Ethical, Dilemma

Related Posts

» Vt. debates letting parents say no to vaccines BY DAVE GRAM

» The Greatest Health Risk to Children? No, It’s Not Drugs

» Whooping cough vaccine fades in pre-teens: study

» CDC sees improving flu vaccine uptake in kids, health workers

» Children should be screened for cholesterol, panel says

» No anthrax vaccine testing on children for now

» Parents should avoid pestering kids for meals

» Vaccine bill overrides parents on child health

(added few months ago!) / 86 views